Can we note that Dottore calls this whole thing an experiment and not a mission or research, but an experiment.

And while Dottore is passionate about the experiment he seems almost passive about the results, because that's what scholars typically do anyway.

But to really explain my point I need you all to understand that an experiment is not a definitive and instead a test for something, it's 3rd stage of the scientific method, not the first.

Which leads me to wonder? What on earth is Dottore testing for? Like what question? And we know he does that for all his other experiment by the way, he was always trying to answer a question of sorts like "effects of god remains on humans" "aranaras and dreams" and etc. All those were to answer a question.

Also before doing an experiement there's meant to be a hypothesis, which is possible but non-definitive answer to the question and can't acrually be called true or false only proven or disproven. Which is what the experiment stage is for.

I wanna know what the scientific question he asked is and the hypothesis he is trying to prove/disproved. The results themselves doesn't necessarily prove you right by the way, simply opens up the possibilty for further experiments based on the results since the experiment needs to be replicated multiple times in order to be a definitive.

Anyway thanks for coming to my ted talk.


Voir le contenu lié