Remember when “electro-charged is better than lunar-chrged”
I remember people skipping saying she was just an emily, and here we are… I always believed in her 🥹
Commentaires
Efficient_Bluebird_22026-01-23 21:44
I fell for the Emilie comparison the first time. Glad I got Ineffa this time around.
QWERTYAF12412026-01-23 21:45
She wouldn't be nearly this broken if they didn't make shields/mechanics work like 3x more effectively for lunar-charge on top of increasing total boss hp pool, by hundreds of thousands if not millions of hp, if you're not using lunar-charge specifically. Like she's good because she provides a good shield and can apply consistent electro while doing decent damage but she's not nearly as broken in IT or in overworld.
Zera_Scarlet2026-01-23 21:53
Yep, people didn't expect Lunar shill to be this strong. So many Nod Krai enemies punish the players so hard who don't have Lunar characters.
Joe_from_ungvar2026-01-23 21:53
not nearly as broken in IT? that has reaction buffs?
QWERTYAF12412026-01-23 21:55
She can be replaced with Kuki, Raiden, Fischl, etc. It only matters that an electro reaction is used for the buff.
Joe_from_ungvar2026-01-23 22:38
IT
has the extra attack generating passives
and there is also damage buff passive as well, or shreds
you pick which ones to get
so, obviously a stronger character like Ineffa with constant damage can use those buffs even better than 4 stars like Kuki or Raiden with the low field time
and IT has straight up Lunar charge buff included in the EC damage buff
QWERTYAF12412026-01-23 23:02
Kuki and Raiden have off-field electro application so idk what you're talking about with low field time. Raiden does far more on-field damage than Ineffa so she can serve as a carry in IT. Ineffa is pure support. She needs someone else to be on-field and attack.
Joe_from_ungvar2026-01-23 23:25
Raiden has never been a carry. she has a 7 second duration burst
and very weak off field damage, and youre using her with random teammates in IT,
and Ineffa is a subdps with constant off field damage, and shield on top of that
id be saving Ineffa for later stages than a Raiden
if i had them on the same account
what i described for IT buffs,
extra attacks are better with the many weak hits
damage buffs and shreds are better with stronger dps
so you need to make the choice of which one you go for
every IT run, depending on which you think is better for your characters
QWERTYAF12412026-01-23 23:45
Raiden is still a decent carry. Her damage is still pretty decent, applies a lot of electro, and refills everybody's burst. She's just not a good hypercarry anymore without a lot of strong sub-dps support. Her off-field electro application applies constantly to everybody that gets damaged on the field every 2.5 seconds. She's literally S-tier at applying electro and causing electro reactions against anything not shielded like the tailor-made boss made for Ineffa in SO.
Ineffa's electro application is focused on one enemy or a small group of enemies grouped together. She's also completely useless on-field since all she has is a polearm that does nothing. Her burst does extremely mediocre damage that is mostly just used to refresh the Birgitta's field-time, if it's used at all since using her skill already does that.
nxtquy2026-01-24 03:12
I’m not sure if it’s boss mechanics alone that make Ineffa strong. It’s well known right now that Columbina and Ineffa together is an extremely strong team core, that provides a very high floor for DPS in a variety of teams. You can test out the DPS on a dummy unit (with no special mechanics) and see that they contribute a significant amount of DPS, and the team DPS with non-meta characters (Navia for example) now rivals the DPS of more modern characters.
QWERTYAF12412026-01-24 03:22
That's just Columbina being broken for lunar reactions and Ineffa being able to constantly proc lunar-charge off-field.
LiDragonLo2026-01-23 21:49
I never heard any1 say this ngl
Now wat i've seen in calcs is that they both have the same ceiling, but lunar has a higher floor. Which in turn always made it better on average
Axheron2026-01-23 22:00
The BEST spur of the moment, against all odds, I dont even want her, pull I ever did in the 6 years Ive played Genshin was getting Ineffa. She is so much fun and so ridiculously crucial for NodKrai teams.
Akikala2026-01-23 22:03
Well, lunar charged is pretty much just electro charged. It's Ineffa's kit that makes her so strong, not the reaction.
No-Piano-9872026-01-24 02:30
Yup, just like Lauma and Lunar Bloom.
AlaindeshoGT2026-01-23 22:09
I believed in her from the very begining too.. but mainly 'couse i liked the character and the design. I had no idea she was going to be that good
JohnnyCasul2026-01-23 22:10
I got her first time because I thought she was the electro shielder Cyno desperately needed
Now I just love her
InukoJon2026-01-23 22:45
When you heard this, were you in a padded room?
SocietyAvailable45492026-01-23 22:53
that’s until these meta slaves found out everything is lunar locked and then they pull out the “ohh I want lauma, flins, nefer, bina, ineffa, c6 jahoda and c6 aino”
DaSpood2026-01-24 00:02
Well yeah the reaction itself is ass and indeed comparable to electro charged. And back when Ineffa released she was pretty much that.
Obviously when you add 3 artefact sets and 2 five star characters (on top of ineffa) dedicated to making the reaction stronger then yeah it becomes better. If electro-charged also had the opportunity to get a dedicated 200% damage bonus it would be pretty nice too. Compare what is comparable.
Also half the combat content in the game since her release have been balanced around taking 3x more damage from lunar reactions. If tomorrow a boss released with a 5x multiplier on electrocharged and only 1x for lunar charge it would also become pretty meta.
Ineffa was a gamble when she released for the same reason Emilie was. Either she could have received the same treatment, get Flins with some synergy in 6.0 and end it here, or she could have received the treatment Lunar reactions ended up getting and sit at the top of the meta for half a year. Emilie was novel and teased improvements for unliked reactions, she ended up being meaningless, it made sense that people saw Ineffa being the same to EC at the time. And if in 6.7 they release a Shatter support, people will rightfully still have doubts about it.
SecyaDenali2026-01-24 00:38
My freind said she was cracked a week after i got her my first 5 star. She slotted into the Nuevilette team with no help just her being her since escoffier doesnt have a shield and no proper Aoe. Nothing has changed
Her kit has so much value.
I play Fisch, Furina, Ineffa alot together to keep things fair
I dont get why Fischl gets mega glazed shes great but Ineffa aint a sidegrade at all the auto targeting, uptime, shield dumps in on both btw. Even on single target brigitta mogs it because enemies dont stay still.
Its like she solved all the jank with Fischl, Xiangling and Beidou all in one.
Commentaires
has the extra attack generating passives
and there is also damage buff passive as well, or shreds
you pick which ones to get
so, obviously a stronger character like Ineffa with constant damage can use those buffs even better than 4 stars like Kuki or Raiden with the low field time
and IT has straight up Lunar charge buff included in the EC damage buff
and very weak off field damage, and youre using her with random teammates in IT,
and Ineffa is a subdps with constant off field damage, and shield on top of that
id be saving Ineffa for later stages than a Raiden
if i had them on the same account
what i described for IT buffs,
extra attacks are better with the many weak hits
damage buffs and shreds are better with stronger dps
so you need to make the choice of which one you go for
every IT run, depending on which you think is better for your characters
Ineffa's electro application is focused on one enemy or a small group of enemies grouped together. She's also completely useless on-field since all she has is a polearm that does nothing. Her burst does extremely mediocre damage that is mostly just used to refresh the Birgitta's field-time, if it's used at all since using her skill already does that.
Now wat i've seen in calcs is that they both have the same ceiling, but lunar has a higher floor. Which in turn always made it better on average
Now I just love her
Obviously when you add 3 artefact sets and 2 five star characters (on top of ineffa) dedicated to making the reaction stronger then yeah it becomes better. If electro-charged also had the opportunity to get a dedicated 200% damage bonus it would be pretty nice too. Compare what is comparable.
Also half the combat content in the game since her release have been balanced around taking 3x more damage from lunar reactions. If tomorrow a boss released with a 5x multiplier on electrocharged and only 1x for lunar charge it would also become pretty meta.
Ineffa was a gamble when she released for the same reason Emilie was. Either she could have received the same treatment, get Flins with some synergy in 6.0 and end it here, or she could have received the treatment Lunar reactions ended up getting and sit at the top of the meta for half a year. Emilie was novel and teased improvements for unliked reactions, she ended up being meaningless, it made sense that people saw Ineffa being the same to EC at the time. And if in 6.7 they release a Shatter support, people will rightfully still have doubts about it.
Her kit has so much value.
I play Fisch, Furina, Ineffa alot together to keep things fair
I dont get why Fischl gets mega glazed shes great but Ineffa aint a sidegrade at all the auto targeting, uptime, shield dumps in on both btw. Even on single target brigitta mogs it because enemies dont stay still.
Its like she solved all the jank with Fischl, Xiangling and Beidou all in one.